In 2002, Menon et al. reported on their initial experience with the Robotic Radical prostatectomy with the DaVinci robot (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnydale, CA). Five years later the majority of prostate cancer surgery in the United States is now being done robotically. Physicians in my practice adopted the technology early. Since that time four teams of surgeons at 4 different hospitals have a combined experience with the procedure of nearly 2000 cases. Why?
Prostate cancer surgery has an extirpative as well as a reconstructive component. The cancer must be resected with the intent of achieving “negative margins”. At the same time, it is essential to preserve the quality of life our patients. Laparoscopic robotic surgery allow the surgeon to operate under magnification with excellent dexterity. Clearly, debate exists on whether robotics is any better than a standard open procedure. Certain points, however, remain undebatable.
First, robotic radical prostatectomy has consistently in virtually every series shown a lower risk of blood loss. Blood transfusion rate is lower (less than a 1%) than the standard open approaches to prostate cancer surgery (10-30% depending on series). Additionaly, hospital stay is shorter (usually 1 day compared to 2-5 days), and convalescence is shortened. Cancer control (margin status) has been shown to be equal if not better.
While patients with more extensive disease, larger prostates, previous abdominal surgery, or higher body mass indexes (heavier set patients), may still be offered open surgery, we are now routinely are able to offer this subset of patients the robotic approach while achieving excellent outcomes.
Most urologist would agree that this technology is “here to stay”. Robotic surgery is now part of the routine training that Urology residents are receiving at many institutions. As with any new technology or procedure, (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparscopic nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy) there always exists a period of time of learning and transition. In the last five years, we have witnessed a very rapid transition from open prostate cancer surgery to robotic laparoscopic prostate cancer surgery. The debate may continue for a number of years on whether it is the new gold standard. However, the ultimate winner will be our patients, who will routinely be offered this procedure when appropiate .
Saturday, September 29, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I agree with your points. If you have any video clips, I'd love to see them. You seem like one heck of a urologist.
"While patients with more extensive disease, larger prostates, previous abdominal surgery, or higher body mass indexes (heavier set patients), may still be offered open surgery, we are now routinely are able to offer this subset of patients the robotic approach while achieving excellent outcomes.
"
I have found the same thing. I trained at Indiana from 1997-2003, in pat under the mentorship of Dr Scot and Hollensbe. Our 9 man practice in NJ has not performed an open prostate cancer surgery since 2004. My approach has always been to try the surgery robotically and to convert to open if I needed to, but this only happened once in the first 20 prostates and ha not happened in the last 320 dvPs.
I have also been performing most of my bladder surgery (cystectomy) and kidney cancer surgery robotically as well (partial and radical nephrectomies).
Tell Dr Knapp that Dominic says hello.
Welcome to the blogging world.
Hey dom
great that you saw the blog
I am finding it to be a great way to exchange info
nice video of the middle lobe
bb
Post a Comment